Underneath of a bridge, travelling over a basketball court.
Issue 2

Creating and capturing value in major road projects

Introduction

Not all road projects are the same. Some include thought-provoking road-side art, stylish overpasses, delightful walking and bike paths, geographically appropriate landscaping, or are built using innovative recycled materials that produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions.

As road users and local communities, we delight in such features that go beyond the asphalt, line-markings, drainage and street signs. So why don’t all road projects include these enhancements?

Firstly, road authorities are experts in roads – how they are made, how they perform and what their core purpose is. Typically, major road projects will aim to connect communities and workplaces, improve road quality and safety, as well as reduce congestion and travel times. By thinking more broadly, road projects can be designed and delivered in a way that creates enhanced public value beyond that achieved by the core project scope. This concept is known as value creation.

Secondly, roads are costly and budgets are tight. Who pays for the extras, the ‘nice to haves’, when there are core objectives to be met? Where government investments deliver benefits to individuals and businesses, some of this value can be captured by government, reducing its overall financial investment and helping to fund current and future projects. This concept is known as value capture.

Major Road Projects Victoria (MRPV) represents a new face of road agencies in Australia. An agency that aims to do more for the entire Victorian community – not just drivers – by delivering cost-effective projects.

To help MRPV incorporate Value Creation and Capture (VCC) mechanisms into its road projects, MRPV engaged ARRB to:

  1. Develop a tailored process for identifying and assessing VCC opportunities.
  2. Provide detailed information on VCC mechanisms that are applicable to MRPV’s projects.
“We engaged ARRB for this piece because we sought to build understanding of the VCC Framework within MRPV and how it could be applied in major road projects, as few examples were available. ARRB have since produced a report that is a valuable resource in many instances and which we have shared across the organisation. It provides an in-depth background on the framework for anyone new to it and acts as a touch-point for project managers looking for a concise VCC roadmap and highly relevant potential mechanisms.”

– Kathleen Hare, Project Development Officer, Major Road Projects Victoria

Victoria’s Value Creation and Capture Framework

In 2017, the Victorian Government released Victoria’s Value Creation and Capture Framework. The framework establishes an expectation on government agencies, such as MRPV, to think beyond the core project outcomes of a project (e.g. reducing congestion and travel times, improving safety, connecting communities) and consider the wider opportunities available. For example, when building infrastructure or developing precincts, government can enable economic opportunities, build green space, community services, housing and education opportunities, as well as create more value for the community than would otherwise be the case.

“A core objective of all government activities and investments is to create public value”

– Victoria’s Value Creation and Capture Framework, State of Victoria (Department of Premier and Cabinet), 2017

In adopting a Value Creation and Capture Framework, MRPV can harness the potential of its investment to create additional value for the community.

Figure 1: Repurposed open space beneath the bridge. Source: West Gate Tunnel Project (2020).

Value creation

The VCC Framework defines value creation as:

Delivering enhanced public value, in terms of economic, social and environmental outcomes. This enhancement of public value is above and beyond what would ordinarily be achieved as a direct consequence of the relevant government investment.

Major road projects can create value by incorporating smart thinking or additional investments beyond the core project scope that enhance the overall project benefits. Benefits from road-project value creation can include:

  • Economic benefits: increased growth and job opportunities; improved workforce participation.
  • Social benefits: improved access to housing, employment, education or recreation; enhanced public safety (road safety, improved street lighting); increased recreational infrastructure such as bike paths and parks; and improved social connectivity.
  • Environmental benefits: greening and enhancement of natural catchments in cities and towns; increased energy and/or water efficiency; building sustainability; climate change adaptation; and decreased greenhouse gas emissions.

Major road project beneficiaries can be diverse, including among others: transport users; property owners/occupiers; developers; infrastructure operators (e.g. road operators such as Transurban, tram and train franchisees); businesses and workers; governments; and the wider community.

Value capture

Value capture is a form of infrastructure funding that aligns the cost of infrastructure more directly with those that benefit from government investment or planning decisions. This is also known as beneficiary pays funding (Infrastructure Victoria, 2016).

The VCC Framework defines value capture as:

Government capturing a portion of the incremental economic value created by government investments, activities and policies. These actions may generate alternative revenue streams, assets or other financial value for Government which could assist in funding those investments and activities.

Value capture revenue can partly offset the costs of delivering additional government services and enhance the wider social benefits and objectives associated with capital investment.

Value capture is not a new practice, although more attention has been paid in recent years to using value capture as a distinct way of raising revenue to fund public infrastructure. Victoria already uses various forms of value capture, including:

  • ‘Automatic uplift’ in existing taxes – land-based taxes such as State land tax and stamp duty, Commonwealth Capital Gains Tax and local government rates (only where a growing revenue base is translated into higher rates through the rate-setting process); and taxes such as State payroll tax and Commonwealth income tax where infrastructure raises economic productivity and incomes. In the past, levies were used to partially fund Melbourne’s City Loop.
  • Developer charges and related mechanisms – one-off or in-kind contributions to the cost of providing infrastructure in a development area, including the Growth Area Infrastructure Contribution (a contribution scheme designed to cover 15 per cent of State infrastructure costs in Melbourne’s growth areas); Development Contribution Plans and legal agreements under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 for funding early, basic and essential local infrastructure; the new Victorian Infrastructure Contributions system; and other charges such as Places Victoria’s Infrastructure Recovery Charge.
Figure 2: Off-road paths and roadside landscaping
  • Property development, asset sales and leases – including the sale of air rights or government-owned land around new infrastructure (such as the development rights associated with Southern Cross Station and Melbourne Central Station); and the lease of advertising rights and significant telecommunications services. These are relatively common in infrastructure provision in Victoria.
  • User charges – applied for the use of a specific asset each time the asset is used, in-principle providing the clearest form of value capture mechanism. Road tolls and public transport fares are common forms of user charges applied for transport in Australia (Infrastructure Victoria, 2016).

In 2016, Infrastructure Victoria identified opportunities for new or enhanced value capture mechanisms for capturing some of the indirect benefits of infrastructure, including:

  • Developer contributions.
  • Betterment levies.
  • Major beneficiary contributions.
  • Property development, asset sales or leases (Infrastructure Victoria, 2016).
Figure 3: Roadside advertising billboards. Source: BroadGroup (2016)

Developments from ARRB’s review

An extensive desktop review was undertaken for Major Roads Projects Victoria covering:

  • Victorian Government policy and guidance, including the VCC Framework and Guidelines and its infrastructure investment procurement policies and guidelines.
  • VCC theory, mechanisms and case studies from other Victorian, interstate and international sources.

Interviews were conducted with key MRPV stakeholders and potential VCC partners, including officers from the Department of Premier and Cabinet, the Department of Transport, the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, Infrastructure Victoria and Sustainability Victoria.

The results of this work included a tailored VCC identification process and a long list of candidate value creation and capture opportunities for use by MRPV in its project planning and business case development.

Victoria’s VCC Framework provided a generic approach for VCC and lacked the specific detail needed by engineers and project managers. ARRB created a tailored process to identify and assess VCC mechanisms. The processes purposely align with phases of the Investment Life Cycle for high value and high risk projects to ensure seamless integration with existing Victorian Government procedures.

Value creation categories

Next, ARRB prepared a long-list of candidate value creation opportunities – known as a ‘shopping list’ – that MRPV could draw on to build into new road project plans.

There are many different types of public value that can be generated through value creation mechanisms. The VCC framework identifies seven types of value, or value creation categories as shown in Figure 4 (identified in light green):

  • Productivity and cost efficiency.
  • Asset values’
  • Commercial opportunities
  • Accessibility.
  • Public safety/health and amenity.
  • Social capital.
  • Environmental, cultural and heritage.

Based on wider research and discussions with some of MRPV’s stakeholders, three additional value creation categories were identified: future proofing; future enabling; and social licence/reputation as shown in Figure 4 (identified in dark green):

  • Future proofing.
  • Future enabling.
  • Social licence and reputation.

Value Creation

Productivity and Cost Efficiency

Asset Values

Commercial Opportunity

Accessability

Safety and Amenity

Social Capital

Protect and Enhance the Environment and Cultural Heritage

Future Proofing

Future Enabling

Social Licence and Reputation

Figure 4: Value creation categories

Value creation mechanisms

ARRB identified 17 individual value creation mechanisms, which were grouped into six categories:

  • Use of recycled materials (reclaimed asphalt pavement, crushed concrete and brick, crushed glass, crumb rubber and recycled plastic).
  • Active transport infrastructure (cycling and walking paths and associated infrastructure).
  • Public open spaces (new and improved open space, roadside furniture, electric vehicle charging stations, green noise walls/barriers, greening and rehabilitating natural environments).
  • Climate adaptation (heat and flood resilience).
  • Commercial opportunities (roadside advertising on adjacent land and incorporated into infrastructure).
  • Procuring to deliver broader government policy objectives (e.g. Victorian industry participation policy, major projects skills guarantee, social procurement policy, ecologiq).

To assist MRPV’s project planning activities, ARRB detailed important information for each mechanism, such as the value type, applicability to different road project types, implementation experience or risks, case studies and quantifiable measures (e.g. costs).

Value capture categories

As with value creation, there are different types of value capture. The VCC Framework identifies four broad value capture categories (Figure 6). Other documents (Infrastructure Victoria 2016; Committee for Melbourne 2012) identify similar variations on these categories.

Of all the different value capture mechanisms identified through the wider research and discussions with some of MRPV’s stakeholders, all could be categorised within the framework’s four identified value capture categories. Figure 6 shows the key value capture categories.

Figure 5: Western Roads Upgrade using recycled materials such as reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), crushed concrete and crushed glass. Source: Greenroads (2019).

Value capture mechanisms

ARRB identified seven value capture mechanisms, grouped into two categories as follows:

  • Lease and sale of rights and assets (lease of advertising space and adjacent land, sale of surplus land and lease or sale of air rights).
  • Other beneficiary payments (planning levies and contributions, user charges and shared private asset manager dividends).

In our advice to MRPV, ARRB recognised the role of existing taxes and rates (land-based and activity-based taxes) as a form of value capture. However, as MRPV does not have any direct control over these revenue instruments, existing taxes and rates should not be included in the VCC plans (except to acknowledge the existing contribution, or tax burden, of project beneficiaries and how this may affect the selection of other value capture mechanisms).

Value Capture

Levies, Taxes & Rates

Commercial returns

Fees and Charges

Beneficiary Payments

Figure 6: Value capture categories

Conclusion

The research found that there are many opportunities to incorporate value creation and value capture mechanisms into major road projects, although not all opportunities are suitable for all project types. The most promising value creation opportunities for road projects include:

  • Using innovative and recycled materials in pavements and surfacings, including crumb rubber additives and reclaimed asphalt pavements, and using climate-resilient technologies.
  • Incorporating active transport infrastructure into road designs, including high-quality cycling and walking paths and associated infrastructure.
  • Creating new or improved public open spaces for community and commercial uses.
  • Generating land-value uplift from improved productivity, accessibility and amenity (e.g. integrating transport modes, active transport links, open space and landscaping).
  • Encouraging businesses to increase the social value and inclusion of their work by rewarding and recognising businesses that support their communities through social procurement.

While value capture opportunities are well established in mass-transit-oriented development (i.e. developments in and around public transport infrastructure), there are fewer opportunities for road projects. Simple, acceptable and implementable value capture opportunities for road projects include commercial opportunities linked to roadside advertising and the sale or lease of surplus land, easements and air rights. Governments could also consider a range of road-user charging mechanisms, planning levies and contribution schemes to generate a return on their investments, although these mechanisms can be complex to implement and may lack public support.

The key to identifying VCC opportunities that meet diverse needs is to engage and collaborate with a wide range of government, business and community stakeholders early in project planning. Stakeholder engagement helps to understand project site/area context and issues; address diverse government policy objectives (e.g. increasing the use of recycled materials and supporting local industries and employment); learn from case studies; and tailor approaches to benefit local businesses and communities.

In assessing VCC opportunities, it is important to consider broad government policy objectives, across all portfolios, and the costs and simplicity of implementation.

In engaging ARRB to prepare a tailored value creation and capture process and identify a long-list of candidate mechanisms, MRPV is demonstrating leadership and delivering enhanced outcomes for all Victorians, whether road users or not.

References
  • BroadGroup 2016, AWS Direct connect now live at NEXTDC Melbourne, webpage, BroadGroup, London, United Kingdom, viewed 22 January 2020, <https://www.broad-group.com/data/news/documents/b1mdn4lgc22137>.
  • Committee for Melbourne 2012, Moving Melbourne: a transport funding and financing discussion paper, Committee for Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, viewed 22 August 2019, <http://melbourne.org.au/docs/moving-melbourne--a-transport-funding-and-financing-discussion-paper.pdf>.
  • GreenRoads 2019, ‘Millions of bottles recycled in western roads upgrade’, webpage, Alex Fraser, Derrimut, Vic, viewed 22 January 2020, <https://greenroads.com.au/projects/roads/millions-of-bottles-recycled-in-western-roads-upgrade>.
  • Infrastructure Victoria 2016, Value capture: options, challenges and opportunities for Victoria, policy paper, Infrastructure Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, viewed 22 January 2020, <https://www.infrastructurevictoria.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/IV18-Value-Capture-Options_Final-web_v2_0.pdf>.
  • Victorian Government Department of Premier and Cabinet 2017, Victoria’s value creation and capture framework, Victoria State Government, Melbourne, Vic, viewed 23 January 2020, <https://www.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-02/Victorias-Value-Creation-Capture-Framework.pdf>.
  • Victorian Government Department of Premier and Cabinet 2018, Victoria’s value creation and capture framework guidelines, Victoria State Government, Melbourne, Vic, viewed 23 January 2020, <https://www.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-02/value-creation-capture-framework-guidelines.pdf>.
  • West Gate Tunnel Project 2020, West gate tunnel project, webpage, Victoria State Government, Melbourne, Vic, viewed 22 January 2020, <http://westgatetunnelproject.vic.gov.au/>.
Brook Hall
Executive Director - CCAT
NTRO
Lydia Thomas
Environmental Engineer
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Lydia Thomas
Environmental Engineer
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Lydia Thomas
Environmental Engineer
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Lydia Thomas
Environmental Engineer
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Lydia Thomas
Environmental Engineer
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Lydia Thomas
Environmental Engineer
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Lydia Thomas
Environmental Engineer
Suburban Rail Loop Authority
Interiew

Creating and capturing value in major road projects

Roads
Related articles